3699 Wilshire Blvd. Ste 700, Los Angeles, CA 90010 Mon-Fri 9am-6pm +1-213-387-4508
Pets often feel like they’re truly part of our families. During the tumult of divorce, while couples meticulously navigate child custody and other familial adjustments, the fate of beloved pets sometimes gets overlooked. Yet, the battle for pet custody is increasingly becoming a frontline issue in family disputes, as highlighted by a 2014 survey from the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, which noted a surge in such cases.
In the shift of California law effective January 2019, pets are no longer viewed solely as personal property in divorces. Rather, the pet’s well-being and emotional bonds are considered, with family law courts now empowered to issue joint custody and care directives akin to child custody standards.
The ‘best interest of the pet’ standard in California family law now guides decisions in pet custody cases, evaluating such things as primary caregiving, emotional attachment, suitable living arrangements, and comprehensive veterinary care records.
California allows for either sole or joint pet ownership awards in divorce cases, where the pet’s classification as community or separate property can influence custody decisions; the law recognizes the roles of primary caregivers and supports alternative dispute resolutions such as mediation.
California’s legal viewpoint of pets underwent a remarkable transformation in 2019. Pets were previously and coldly deemed physical property akin to furniture or vehicles, to be divided as assets during divorce proceedings. However, since January 2019, courts have evolved in their worldview to consider the well-being and emotional bonds of pets when deciding custody, marking a game changing departure from their previous stance that viewed pets as mere personal property.
This legal development has led to an increase in pet custody cases, with courts now prioritizing the pets’ best interests and considering factors like care and emotional bonds, instead of just focusing on who bought or adopted the pet.
In January 2019, California enacted AB2274, a new law that fundamentally changed the game by allowing courts to establish joint custody agreements for pets and issue directives regarding their care prior to making a final decision about ownership in divorce cases. This law empowered judges to consider the care and best interest of pets, drawing parallels with child custody considerations, when making decisions in separation or divorce scenarios.
Family Code section 2605 allows for temporary orders that safeguard the well-being of pets during divorce proceedings and clarify that such orders do not determine the final ownership of the pet. Judges began exercising this authority from the onset of January 2019.
Family Code section 2605 represents a significant change in legal viewpoint, treating pets more like family members than inanimate assets during divorce proceedings. While pets remain technically classified as personal property in California, judges now have clearer guidelines to award custody based on what is deemed best for the animal. This development denotes a shift away from the traditional view of pets as inanimate property.
By law, pets are now viewed as more than property, acknowledging their unique role in the lives of their owners. A pet animal is defined as:
a community property kept as a household pet
for the purposes of custody considerations under the California Family Code section 2605
distinguishing them from animals kept for other purposes, and emphasizing the importance of pet animal ownership.
The ‘best interest of the pet’ standard, similar to the principle applied in child custody, centers around the welfare and well-being of pets in divorce cases. This ‘best interest’ standard applies to all types of animals kept as pets, not solely to traditional domestic pets such as cats and dogs. The court assesses various elements, including who the primary caregiver is, the pet’s daily care routines such as feeding and walking, and the emotional bonds between the pet and owners.
Under the evolved California legislation, pets are regarded with a focus on their best interests during divorce proceedings, similar to how child custody is approached, marking a significant move away from the traditional view of pets as merely property.
When evaluating pet well-being, California courts give priority to factors like:
Primary caregiving
Emotional connections between owners and pets
Suitable living arrangements that maintain the pet’s accustomed environment and daily routine
A holistic view of the pet’s needs, including emotional, physical, and financial needs
The assessment also encompasses a careful consideration of these factors to ensure the well-being of the pet.
Ultimately, determining pet custody hinges on a thorough evaluation that ensures the pet’s best interest, security, and happiness are placed at the forefront.
Comprehensive veterinary care records play a crucial role in pet custody cases, as they show who has regularly taken the pet to the vet and thus demonstrate who has been the primary caregiver. The definition of ‘care’ under section 2605 includes:
Basic necessities like food and water
Prevention of cruelty
Veterinary care
A safe shelter
These factors contribute to the court’s assessment of pet custody.
Access to the pet’s veterinary care information is critical, requiring both parties involved in custody disputes to promptly share information regarding the pet’s health and treatments received.
Under California law, courts can award either sole or joint ownership of pets in divorce cases, taking into consideration the pet’s best interests, which may include factors for determining visitation. A pet’s classification as community or separate property is crucial in determining custody; pets acquired during the marriage could see custody influenced by their best interests, while pets owned prior to the marriage are likely awarded based on legal ownership.
Temporary orders for pet care during divorce proceedings, per section 2605, do not determine the final custody outcome, allowing the court to make a final decision irrespective of temporary measures. The general approach to pet custody in California is to view pets as personal property, but this perspective can be expanded by the court’s broader discretion when ensuring pets’ welfare.
When deciding custody, California courts take into account the primary caregiver of the pet, which involves who took care of the pet on a daily basis. The role of the primary caregiver can be essential in establishing full ownership claims during divorce proceedings, highlighting the significance of caregiving in custody decisions.
Courts evaluate the emotional attachment between the pet and each party based on evidence of a special bond or relationship. This helps in determining the best outcome for the pet in legal matters. The court may look at financial responsibility for the pet’s needs, including the ability to provide for ongoing medical care and covering expenses like food and veterinary bills. A stable home environment and the party’s ability to maintain a consistent routine for the pet are taken into account in custody decisions.
Registration details, such as whose name the animal is registered under, can influence a judge’s decision on pet custody.
In California, pets acquired during the marriage are recognized as community property within the marital estate. Community property is defined as property acquired by either spouse during the marriage and includes pets acquired during this period. Separate property refers to assets owned before marriage, after separation, or acquired as a gift or inheritance, and these guidelines extend to pet ownership as well.
Assembly Bill 2274 applies specifically to community property pets and does not alter custody considerations for pets that were owned by one spouse prior to the marriage.
Under the current California family law, pets are treated similarly to children in divorce proceedings, with the pet’s well-being being taken into consideration. Divorcing pet owners in California can expect more peace of mind with the new pet custody law that outlines clearer guidelines based on the best interest of the animal. To better understand how pet custody law works, it’s important to note that the emotional well-being of the pet owners and their connection with the pet are key factors examined during the determination of pet custody.
Attorneys may need to navigate through issues where the pet is used as a point of contention for power and control in custody disputes, shifting the focus from the animal’s well-being.
Being mindful of behavioral changes such as separation anxiety or depression in pets post-divorce is essential, as the transition can be equally challenging for them. Here are some tips to support their emotional adjustment to new living arrangements:
Provide reassurance and spend quality time with the pet.
Maintain a consistent feeding, walking, and playtime schedule to provide a sense of familiarity.
Acclimate pets to their carrier or crate prior to a move, ensuring it is a comfortable space.
Create a safe and secure environment in the new home.
By following these tips, you can help your pet navigate the changes and settle into their new routine more easily.
Introducing pets gradually to new spaces within the new home allows them to explore safely and helps in preventing them from feeling overwhelmed. Creating a dedicated, peaceful area for the pet in the new residence can provide them with a secure refuge during the adjustment period. Engaging in activities such as longer walks and exploring new surroundings can help a dog adjust to a new routine after their owners’ divorce. Socializing the pet with new neighbors and animals at a gradual pace aids in their settling into a new community.
Pet owners involved in custody disputes can join support groups or forums to share experiences and gain emotional support from others in similar situations. Engaging in self-care practices such as exercise, meditation, or hobbies can help pet owners manage stress during custody disputes.
Consulting with a therapist or counselor who specializes in pet loss and bereavement can provide guidance and coping strategies for emotional distress.
Engaging a divorce attorney with a deep understanding of California’s pet custody law can result in more favorable outcomes for pet owners. Charles M. Green takes a personal approach to each case, emphasizing the fight for the rights of both the pet and owner. Family Law Specialists are crucial in pet custody due to the significant impact their legal expertise can have on the case’s outcome. An experienced divorce custody attorney can protect pet owners’ rights by ensuring that all agreements made during the divorce process prioritize the pet’s well-being. Securing competent family law representation will alleviate your concerns knowing you are being guided by the up to date knowledge on the right you and your pet are afforded under California law.
When it comes to pet custody during a divorce in California, the beloved animal is not merely a piece of property. Instead, they are a cherished companion who has shared moments of joy, comfort, and love with both parties. Factors such as who originally brought the pet into the family, who has been the primary caregiver, and what arrangement would best serve the pet’s well-being are thoughtfully considered. Ultimately, judges exercise discretion to ensure that the pet’s happiness and quality of life remain a priority during this challenging time
The new dog law in California mandates that local governments accommodate pets at shelters during emergencies. Additionally, pet owners will have the option to schedule remote video visits with veterinarians.
Yes, California has pet custody laws that consider the best interests and future welfare of the pet during divorce proceedings, as of January 1, 2019.
Before the new law, pets were considered as physical property in California courts and would be divided like furniture or cars in case of a divorce.
Judges determine custody for both children and pets based on what is in their best interests.
